JAINSONS DEPARTMENTAL STORES,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT- 18, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. Given that the assessee had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and the department had issued Form No. 5, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to availing the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’ NEW DLEHI
Before: SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI & SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 19.02.2019, impugned herein, passed by the learned Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax -18, Delhi u/s. 263 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2014-15.
The learned AR of the Assessee vide application dated 25.07.2022 claimed that since the Assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e. Vivad Se Vishwas under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No. 5 in response to the application filed by the Assessee under the scheme, therefore, the Assessee’s appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not refute the factual position and claim of the Assessee.
Considering the request of the ld. AR for withdrawal of the appeal and Form-5 dated 24.03.2021 (Copy already on record) issued by the Department, the appeal of Assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn, hence, ordered accordingly.
In the result, Assessee’s appeal under consideration stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27/07/2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026