SMT. CHITRA JAIN, 250-P, SECTOR-23, NEAR HOODA MARKET, J GURGAON, HARYANA,GURGAON vs. ITO WARD-1(4), JAIPUR, WARD-1(4), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw her appeal as she had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme to settle the matter.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee if they have opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 624/JP/2019
ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-I, Jaipur dated 07/02/2019 for the A.Y. 2014-15.
The hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 Pandemic.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee furnished application for withdrawal of this appeal mentioning the fact that the assessee has opted Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, has been submitted and requested for withdrawal of the present appeal.
Therefore, in view of the fact that the assessee has already approached the department to settle the matter under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, we permit the assessee to withdraw her appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 16th April, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼foØe flag ;kno½ ¼lanhi x®lkÃa½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 16/04/2021 *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Smt. Chitra Jain, Gurgaon, Haryana. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The I.T.O., Ward-1(4), Jaipur 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 624/JP/2019) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026