GOLFGREEN RESIDENCY PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-10(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1920/DEL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 August 2022AY 2015-163 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee was not provided with a due opportunity of being heard and that the CIT(A) had not decided the grounds of appeal on merits. Consequently, the CIT(A)'s ex parte order was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex parte. The assessee contended that they were not given a reasonable opportunity of being heard and that the CIT(A) did not decide the grounds on merit.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) followed the principles of natural justice by providing an adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee and deciding the appeal on merits.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : B : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI C.M. GARG & SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA

For Respondent: Shri R.S. Yadav, Sr. DR
Hearing: 18.08.2022Pronounced: 25.08.2022

ORDER

PER C.M. GARG, JM:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 24.02.2020 of the CIT(A), Delhi-4, relating to Assessment Year 2015-16.

2.

The assessee, through its ground of appeal No.1 has agitated that the ld.CIT(A) has not provided reasonable and adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. It was contended that the ld.CIT(A) has passed his ex parte order without appreciating the correct facts and circumstances of the instant case and without following the principles of natural justice. It was also contended that the ld.CIT(A) has not decided the grounds taken by the assessee before him, on merit.

3.

The ld. Sr. DR, in all fairness, admitted that the ld.CIT(A) has adjudicated the appeal of the assessee ex parte qua the assessee, and, therefore, the Department has no serious objection if the matter is restored to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, after allowing due opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

4.

On careful consideration of the above submissions and grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in Form No.36, I am of the considered opinion that the assessee has not been provided due opportunity of being heard before the ld.CIT(A) and the ld.CIT(A) has also not decided the grounds of appeal on merits. Since the ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal ex parte without deciding the grounds taken by the assessee in Form No.35 on merit, therefore, the order of the CIT(A) is set aside and the appeal is restored to the file of the CIT(A) to first appellate stage.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →