What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee filed a petition under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' for settlement. This petition was accepted and Form 3 was issued.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the settlement of the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Ajay Kumar Luharuwalla vs ITO | ITAT Jaipur 2021

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR

Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 07/JP/2020

For Appellant: Shri J.K. Mehta (C.A.) jktLo dh vksj ls@

Hearing: 21/05/2021Pronounced: 21/05/2021

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 07/JP/2020 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2011-12 cuke Shri Ajay Kumar Luharuwalla The ITO, Vs. B-105, Hanuman Nagar Tulsi Marg, Ward-3(1), Jaipur-302016. Jaipur. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AATPL 9778 R vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri J.K. Mehta (C.A.) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Runi Pal (ACIT) a lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 21/05/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 21/05/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A)-I, Jaipur dated 18.10.2019 for the assessment year 2011-12.

The ld A/R has stated at the Bar that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has recently been accepted and Form 3 has been issued on 22.04.2021 by the competent authority. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. 2 Shri Ajay Kumar Luharuwalla vs. ITO 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.

In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.

AJAY KUMAR LUHARUWALLA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), JAIPUR

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Recent GST High Court judgments