MR. SURYA KANT TRIPATHI,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO WARD-2(2)3, GHAZIABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 372/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 June 2025AY 2012-13Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Covid-19 pandemic and landmark judgments. The Tribunal also noted non-compliance with Section 250(6) of the Act in the lower appellate order and set aside the appeal for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13 arises against an order by the CIT(A)/NFAC. The assessee faced a delay of 681 days in filing the lower appeal, which was refused condonation by the appellate authority.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned, and whether the lower appellate order complied with statutory requirements.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144,Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI

Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara

For Respondent: Ms. Indu Bala Saini, Sr. DR
Hearing: 26.06.2025Pronounced: 26.06.2025

Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Surya Kant Tripathi (Prop.), Vs Income Tax Officer, C-908, Nandgram Mariam Nagar, Ward-2(2)(3), Meerut Road, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad-201001 Uttar Pradesh-201001 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AEDPT0248J Assessee by: Sh. Dinesh, Adv. Revenue by : Ms. Indu Bala Saini, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 26.06.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 26.06.2025 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1070714275(1) dated 28.11.20204, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

3.

It is noticed at the outset that the learned lower appellate authority has refused to condone the assessee’s 681 days delays in filing of the lower appeal instituted on 18.09.2021 against the assessment order dated 09.10.2019. That being the case, it is manifestly clear that most of the intervening time period herein above is covered under Covid-19 pandemic outbreak upto 28.02.2022 which already stood excluded for all

4.

Faced with this situation and in light of the fact that the assessee has already explained the above period of delay of 681 days institution of the lower appeal, the same is hereby condoned going by Collector Land Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC).

5.

This is indeed coupled with the facts that there is also no compliance to section 250(6) of the Act in the impugned lower appellate order stipulating points of determination to be framed followed by a detailed adjudication thereupon. It is therefore deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to set aside the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A)/NFAC for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities of hearing at the appellant’s risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →