INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD vs. NAGANJANEYA SARMA TADEPALLI, HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. This was based on CBDT circulars that set a minimum tax effect limit for Revenue appeals to the Tribunal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against an order of the CIT(A). The appeal was heard through video conferencing.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue meets the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD
Before: SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Sri Naganjaneya Sarma Ward-9(1). Thadepalli, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN: ABSPT 0411 F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: None Revenue by: Shri K.J. Divya, DR /Date of hearing: 18/06/2020 Date of pronouncement: 18/06/2020 ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM.:
This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-7, Hyderabad dated 28/11/2019 in appeal No. 0132/CIT(A)- 7/2019-20 passed U/s. 271D r.w.s 250(6) of the Act for the Asst. Year 2016-17.
This appeal was heard through video conferencing. At the time of hearing it has been brought to our notice that as per the CBDT Circulars No.03/2018 dated 11.07.2018 and Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 9th August, 2019, the tax limit for filing appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal has been fixed at Rs.50.00 lakhs and above. Therefore, since the tax effect in the present appeal before us is less than Rs.50.00 lakh, we hereby dismiss the same with liberty to the Revenue to seek recall of the order, if the appeal falls within the exceptions mentioned in the Circulars of the CBDT.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Pronounced in the open Court on the 18th June, 2020.
More judgments on Section 271D
- Sujatha Vaddanapu, Nalgonda vs ITO, Ward-1, NalgondaITA 2048/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Inder Lal Ramrakhyani, Dhamtari vs ITO, DhamtariITA 694/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Harshit Singhania Buildcon, RaipurITA 560/RPR/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shree Jalaram Finance, Borsad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(4), PetladITA 1785/AHD/2026[2000-01]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Veera Mani Kumari Vattikooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1218/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026