GURINDER SINGH GILL,KHARAR vs. ITO, W-6(3), MOHALI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. This was based on the assessee's successful application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, which the Revenue did not object to.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders of the CIT(A). During the pendency of the appeals, the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and obtained a certificate from the designated authority.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be withdrawn due to the assessee availing the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH BENCH “B”, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI. N.K.SAINI, VP & SHRI , RAVISH SOOD, JM
PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT Both the above appeals are filed by the Assessee against the separate orders of the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Chandigarh each dt. 30/08/2019.
2. The Ld. Counsel for the Assessee furnished an application for withdrawal of the above appeals stating therein as under:
SUBJECT: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL IN THE CASE OF SH. GURINDER SINGH GILL - REQUEST FOR REGARDING - Respected Sir/Madam, Kindly refer to the subject cited above.
in this regard, it is submitted that the following appeals are pending in the case of above noted assessee before the Hon'ble Bench Chandigarh and are now fixed for hearing on 03/12/2020:- i) Sh, Gurinder Singh Gill - No. lTA 1466/CHANDI/2019 for asstt. year 2010-11 ii) Sh.Gurinder Singh Gill - No. ITA 1467/CHANDI/2019 for asstt. year 2010-11
It is further submitted that declaration under Vivad Se Vishvash Scheme was filed in above noted case for the asstt. Year 2010-11 and Form No.3 has been issued by the designated authority(copy enclosed). As per provisions of this Scheme, above noted appeals are hereby withdrawn.
4. it is humbly requested that acknowledgement of this letter may kindly be issued and necessary order may be passed accordingly.
Thanking you, Yours faithfully Date: 27/11/2020 Sd/- (GULSHAN ARORA) ADVOCTE (M-9815522018) 3. During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that since the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing Certificate No. 740277480231120, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. Sr. DR did not object if appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026