SEEDWORKS SINGAPORE PTE LIMITED,SINGAPORE vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-2, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw its appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order. Subsequently, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal due to settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal after opting for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD ‘B’ BENCH : Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony
Date of Hearing : 11/08/2020 Date of Pronouncement : 12/08/2020 O R D E R Per Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, J.M.
This is assessee’s appeal against the assessment order dated 21/10/2019 passed u/s 144C r.w.s. 143(3) of the I.T.Act, 1961.
At the outset, ld.Counsel for assessee vide e-mail dated 06/08/2020 requested as under: “Dear Sir, Ref: Seedworks Singapore Pte Ltd. (PAN AARCS1178F) AY 2016-17 Appeal filed against the final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144C (13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 21st October, 2019. Appeal no. 1789/Hyd/2019.
Sub: Request for withdrawal of the appeal.
ITA – IT No. 1789/Hyd/2019 AY 2016-17 M/s SeedWorks Singapore Pte Ltd. Singapore vs. ADIT (IT)-2 We under the instructions, from and on behalf of the Company, submit that the above referred appeal was filed with your Honours on 11 December 2019 against the Final Order dated October 21,2019. In this respect, we wish to state as under: After the appeal was filed before your Honours, the Government of India enacted the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 ('VSV Act') to provide an opportunity to the taxpayers to end their tax disputes by paying the disputed tax and get a waiver from interest and penalties and reduce income tax litigation. Without prejudice to the merits of the appeal filed and the fact that the Company firmly believes that it is entitled to avail the provisions of the India - Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ('DTAA') and not liable to tax in India, the Company with the sole objective of ending the ongoing tax dispute has filed declaration in prescribed Form 1 as per section 4 of the VSV Act along with an undertaking in Form 2 electronically on August 01,2020 (copy of the filed form is enclosed as Annexure 1). Subsequently, the Designated Authority under the VSV Act has issued an order dated 03 August 2020 (hereinafter referred to as 'VSV Order). providing details of the disputed tax payable by the Company (copy of the VSV Order is enclosed as Annexure 2). Based on the VSV Order. the Company is proposing to remit the disputed tax under the VSV Act. The Company submits that it is a pre-requisite under the VSV Act to withdraw the appeal filed disputing the Final Order of the Assessing Officer and furnish the proof of such withdrawal to the Designated Authority along with the disputed tax payment details! challan. In view of the same, we would like to withdraw this appeal as the appeal in view of settlement of litigation under the VSV Act. Therefore. the Company prays before your Honours to accept the request for withdrawal of the appeal. We request your Honours to take the above on record and oblige. Inconvenience caused to you is regretted.”
ITA – IT No. 1789/Hyd/2019 AY 2016-17 M/s SeedWorks Singapore Pte Ltd. Singapore vs. ADIT (IT)-2
Therefore, as there was a specific request from the assessee to withdraw its appeal, we permit the assessee to ‘withdraw’ its appeal. The appeal hereby stands dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in Open Court on 12/08/2020.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunita Bhagat Proprietor Of Krishab Impex vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026