SHRI BIKARMAJIT SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-6(1), LUDHIANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed applications for withdrawal of their appeals before the ITAT. They had availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received certificates from the Income Tax Department.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessees can withdraw their appeals after availing the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (5 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश/Order
PER BENCH:
All these appeals by the different assessees are directed against the separate orders of different Ld. Commissioners of Income Tax (Appeal) at various stations as per following details:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case CIT(Appeal / s ) Order dt. 1. Smt. Harvinder Kaur, CIT(A)-3, Ludhiana 14/08/2019 Ludhiana 2. Shri Bikramjit CIT(A)-3, Ludhiana 14/08/2019 Singh,Ludhiana 3. ITA No. 1389/Chandi/2019 Shri Gurcharan Singh, CIT(A)-3, Ludhiana 01/06/2019 Ludhiana 4. ITA No. 1168/Chandi/2019 Shri Baldev Prasad CIT(A)-3, Ludhiana 01/06/2019 Gupta, Ludhiana 5. ITA No. 62/Chandi/2020 M/s AKM Shares & Stocks CIT(A)-2, Chandigarh 04/10/2019 (P) Ltd.
In all the above appeals the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees or Assessees themselves furnished separate applications for withdrawal of the appeals.
During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees submitted that since the assessees have availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No. 3 / 5, in response to the applications filed by the assessees, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn. The details of above said certificates are as under:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case Certificate No. 1. Smt. Harvinder Kaur, 796346740091220 Ludhiana 2. Shri Bikramjit 512757520020920 Singh,Ludhiana 3. ITA No. 1389/Chandi/2019 Shri Gurcharan Singh, 796592870091220 Ludhiana 4. ITA No. 1168/Chandi/2019 Shri Baldev Prasad 662962100201020 Gupta, Ludhiana 5. ITA No. 62/Chandi/2020 M/s AKM Shares & Stocks 742069220241120 (P) Ltd.
The Ld. DR did not object if the above appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeals of the assessees are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026