M SRILAKSHMI,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that upon issuance of Form No. 3, the appeal is deemed withdrawn. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Subsequently, the assessee applied under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and received a certificate in Form No. 3.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI N.K.CHOUDHRY & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH
O R D E R
Per Shri D.S.Sunder Singh, Accountant Member :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Visakhapatnam, IN Appeal No.136/2017-18/CIT(A)-3/VSP/2018-19 dated 29.03.2019 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.)2010-11.
When this appeal is taken up for hearing, Ld. Counsel for the assessee has filed a letter stating that the assessee preferred an M.Srilakshmi, Visakhapatnam application u/sec. 4(2) of Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Principal Commissioner (Central), Visakhapatnam was pleased to issue a Certificate in Form No.3 on 09.11.2020. Once Form No.3 is issued by the Pr. Commissioner, the appeal shall be deemed to be withdrawn from the date on which Form No.3 is filed, however, he submitted that appeal may be recalled in case the certificate issued by the Pr. Commissioner is withdrawn at a future date due to any unforeseen contingencies.
Ld.DR has not raised any objection.
We have heard both the sides and gone through the Form No.3 and also gone through the withdrawal petition filed by the assessee. We find that in this case Form No.3 is issued by the Pr.Commissioner and the Ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, however, with a rider that in any case the certificate issued by the Pr.Commissioner is withdrawn at a future date for any reason, it is open to the assessee to file an appropriate application before the Tribunal. In that event, the order passed by the Tribunal would be recalled in accordance with law.
M.Srilakshmi, Visakhapatnam 5. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 22nd December, 2020.
Sd/- Sd/- (एन के चौिरी ) (धड.एस. सुन्दर धसंह) (N.K.CHOUDHRY) (D.S.SUNDER SINGH) न्याधयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER नदनधंक /Dated : 22.12.2020 L.Rama, SPS आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. ननधधाऩरती/ The Assessee– M. Srilakshmi, D.No.49-20-2/A/1, Lalithanagar, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam 2. रधजस्व/The Revenue – Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax , Central Circle-1, Visakhapatnam 3. The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Visakhapatnam 4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Visakhapatnam 5. नवभधगीय प्रनतनननध, आयकर अपीलीय अनधकरण, नवशधखधपटणम/DR,ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6.गधर्ा फ़धईल / Guard file आदेशधनुसधर / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026