SRI NARENDRA LEKHRAJ JAIN,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), VIJAYAWADA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The assessee had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, and the Department had issued Form No. 3.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). During the hearing, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HONBLE
Assessee by : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate. Department by : Smt. Suman Malik, DR Date of hearing : 22/12/2020. Date of pronouncement : 22/12/2020. O R D E R
Per N.K.Choudhry, Judicial Member :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada, dated 20/04/2018 for the Assessment Year 2014-15.
The Assessee has preferred the instant application under consideration for withdrawal of the appeal. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that since the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Income Tax Department 2 (Narendra Lekhraj Jain) has issued Form No. 3 in response to the application filed by the Assessee under the scheme, therefore the appeal of the Assessee may kindly be allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek recall of the order in case unforeseen circumstances would arise in future.
The Ld. DR raised no objection, if the appeal of the Assessee is allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn.
Having heard the parties and perused the application for withdrawal of the appeal and Form-3 (Copy already on record) issued by the Department. Considering the facts and circumstances, the appeal of assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for in accordance of law, hence ordered accordingly.
In the result, instant appeal of the Assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 22nd day of Dec., 2020. Sd/- sd/- (D.S.SUNDER SINGH) (N.K.CHOUDHRY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 22nd December, 2020. vr/- Copy to:
1. 1. The Assessee – Narendra Lekhraj Jain, D.No. 11-32/21, One Town, Angadalavari Street, Vijayawada 2. The Revenue – ITO, Ward-1(1), Vijayawada.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026