ADARSH PAUL SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CC-II, LUDHIANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be withdrawn. The Revenue did not object to the dismissal of the appeals as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed applications for withdrawal of their appeals before the ITAT. They had availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received certificates from the Income Tax Department.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn by the assessees who have opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश/Order
PER BENCH:
All these appeals by the different assessees are directed against the separate orders of different Ld. Commissioners of Income Tax (Appeal) at various stations as per following details:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case CIT(Appeal / s ) Order dt. Smt. Raj Bala 1. CIT(A)-4, Ludhiana 22/03/2019 ITA NO. 286/Chd/2019 Shri Naresh Kumar 2. CIT(A)-5, Ludhiana 28/01/2019 ITA Nos. 712/Chd/2019 Shri Adarsh Paul Singh 3. CIT(A), Bathinda 19/02/2019 4. ITA Nos. 713/Chd/2019 Shri Adarsh Paul Singh CIT(A), Bathinda 19/02/2019
In all the above appeals the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees or Assessees themselves furnished separate applications for withdrawal of the appeals.
During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees submitted that since the assessees have availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No. 3 / 5, in response to the applications filed by the assessees, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn. The details of above said certificates are as under:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case Certificate No. 1. Smt. Raj Bala 644978260131020 2. ITA NO. 286/Chd/2019 Shri Naresh Kumar 797196290091220 3. ITA Nos. 712/Chd/2019 Shri Adarsh Paul Singh 841042780181220 4. ITA Nos. 713/Chd/2019 Shri Adarsh Paul Singh 841474350181220
The Ld. DR did not object if the above appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeals of the assessees are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026