KHED LIONS EDUCATION SOCIETY,RATNAGIRI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemption) relied solely on the survey report without providing the assessee an opportunity to make submissions. The order was passed without adhering to principles of natural justice.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application based on a survey report, alleging surplus generation without utilization for charitable purposes. The assessee argued they were not given an opportunity to respond to the survey report.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration under Section 12AA was valid without providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard on the survey report findings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sree Anjaneya Medical Trust v. CIT47 citing382 ITR 399 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM
आदेश / ORDER
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM :
This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld. CIT(Exemption), Pune dated 30.05.2019 passed u/s.12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
The crux of the grievance of the assessee is rejection of application for registration u/s.12AA of the Act in respect of the assessee trust.
The brief facts in this case are that the assessee trust had E-filed Form 10A for registration of the Trust u/s.12AA of the Act on 15.11.2018. The trust is registered under BPT Act, 1950 vide registration number F-279/Ratnagiri dated 30.06.1979. The assessee has uploaded his submission along with certified copy of trust deed and copy of BPT registration along with Form 10A. That on perusal of the memorandum of association uploaded along with Form 10A, it was observed by the Ld. CIT(Exemption) that the main object of the assessee trust is to provide education and to establish primary, secondary, high school and colleges. Thereafter, the assessee trust was called upon to furnish information/clarification on 17.01.2019 for the purpose of verifying existence and genuineness of its activities and utilization of trust fund towards objects of the society in order to process application for registration u/s.12AA of the Act. Thereafter, it was observed by the Ld. CIT(Exemption) that the assessee trust had generated huge surplus in all years and no details were furnished with respect to the fact that the surplus generated was ploughed back to the beneficiaries or utilized for the charitable purposes. Further, no submission was made in respect of income tax returns of last three years along with computation of income. Considering the facts of the case and non submission of any explanation by the assessee trust, the Jt. CIT(Exemption), Pune was asked to carry out a survey action on the assessee to find out the relevant facts on the case and to get necessary evidences in this regard. Accordingly, a survey u/s.133A of the Act was carried out on the assessee on 22.05.2019. Further, the Jt. CIT(Exemption), Pune was asked to submit factual report vide letter dated 28.05.2019 on the basis of findings of the survey, so as to conclude present 12AA proceedings by the Ld. CIT(Exemption)’s Office. The Jt. CIT (Exemptions), Pune has submitted factual report to the office of the Ld. CIT(Exemption) on 29.05.2019.
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee vehemently argued that the Ld. CIT(Exemption) in his order while rejecting the application for granting registration u/s.12AA of the Act in respect of assessee trust has merely relied on the survey report submitted by the Ld. Jt. CIT(Exemption). The assessee was not given any opportunity to make their submission in respect of that survey report. That further, the Ld. CIT(Exemption) has not brought out his findings regarding relevant documentary evidences submitted and furnished before him. He has just placed reliance on the survey report of the Ld. Jt. CIT(Exemptions) and denied the registration of the assessee trust. The survey report was submitted by the Ld. Jt. CIT(Exemptions) on 29.05.2019 and the very next day i.e. on 30.05.2019, the Ld. CIT(Exemption passed the order rejecting the application for registration u/s.12AA of the Act with regard to the assessee trust. There has been huge lapse in terms of natural justice.
4.1 The Ld. Counsel for the assessee further placed reliance on the decision of the Pune Bench of the Tribunal in wherein, the Tribunal has referred to the decision of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Shri Anjaneya Medical Trust Vs. CIT (2016) 382 ITR 399 (Ker.) on the issue of the scope of inquiry by the Ld. CIT(Appeal) for the registration u/s. 12A and 12AA of the Act which is as follows:
“It is clear from a plain reading of sections 12A and 12AA of the Act that what is intended thereby is only a registration simpliciter of the entity of a trust. This has been made a condition precedent for the claiming of benefits under the other provisions of the Act regarding exemption of income, contribution, etc. No examination of the modus of the application of the funds of the trust or an examination of the ethical background of its settlers is called for while considering an application for registration. The stage for consideration of the relevance of the object of the trust and the application of its funds arises at the time of assessment. Where benefits are claimed by the assessee in terms of sections 11 and 12 of the Act, the question as to the nature of such contribution and income can be looked into. At the time of registration of the trust, going by the binding judgments of the apex court, what is to be looked into is whether the trust is a genuine one and whether it is a sham institution floated only to avail the benefits of exemption under the Act. There is no such finding in the impugned order.”
Thereafter, the Tribunal had restored the issue back to the file of Ld. CIT(Exemption) to decide the issue of registration u/s.12AA of the Act in accordance with law and after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The Ld. Counsel thereafter prayed that the present matter may be remitted back to the file of Ld. CIT(Exemption) for proper adjudication.
Per contra, the Ld. DR placed reliance on the order of the Ld. CIT(Exemption) but principally was agreeable if the matter is restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(Exemption) for re-adjudication in accordance with law.
We have perused the case records and heard the rival contentions. We have also given considerable thought to the facts and circumstances in this case. We find that the survey report was furnished to the office of the Ld. CIT(Exemption) on 29.05.2019 and the entire decision of the Ld. CIT(Exemption) is based on this particular survey report. That further, the order passed by the Ld. CIT(Exemption) was on the very next date i.e. 30.05.2019. Nowhere in the order of the Ld. CIT(Exemption), it comes out that the assessee was given opportunity to counter the survey report or to make any submission in respect thereof before the Ld. CIT(Exemption). That further, opportunity was also not possible since the very next day i.e. on 30.05.2019, the Ld. CIT(Exemption) has passed his order rejecting the application of the assessee trust. The Ld. CIT(Exemption) has not come out with a reasoned order and his findings as per the relevant documentary evidences submitted are missing wherein he has only relied on the survey report and even did not provide the assessee any opportunity to make submissions regarding the said survey report. We take guidance from the judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Shri Anjaneya Medical Trust Vs. CIT (supra.) and considering the totality of facts and circumstances, in the interest of justice, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(Exemptions) and restore the matter back to his file to adjudicate the issue in accordance with law and as per the principles laid down in the findings of the Hon’ble High Court decision (supra.) after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee trust.
In the result, appeal of the assessee trust is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 07th day of January, 2020.
Sd/- Sd/- ANIL CHATURVEDI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER ऩुणे / Pune; ददनाांक / Dated : 07th January, 2020. SB आदेश की प्रतिलऱपप अग्रेपिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 2.
3. The CIT(Exemption), Pune.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Sambaviga Educational Trust, Sivagangai vs CIT (Exemptions), ChennaiChennai16 Mar 2022Remanded
Also relies on Sree Anjaneya Medical Trust v. CIT
The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) did not provide sufficient material to conclude that the genuineness of the trust was in question. The Tribunal restored the application to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication.
- Guru Teg Bahadur Eduational Trust, Jalandhar vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…Amritsar16 Aug 2021Remanded
Also relies on Sree Anjaneya Medical Trust v. CIT
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had made factual errors regarding the trust's financial surplus and had incorrectly inferred that the trust could not file an application under Section 12AA while another application wa...
- Poojya Sindhi Panchayat Kanwar Nagar(Regd)… vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…Jaipur19 Dec 2019Remanded
Also relies on Sree Anjaneya Medical Trust v. CIT
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had not considered the arrangement where the assessee took premises on rent and provided them to needy persons on a no-profit-no-loss basis. The Tribunal also noted that the predominant...
- Goyal Gums Private Limited, Jaipur vs DCIT, Circle-2, JaipurJaipur19 Dec 2019Remanded
Also relies on Sree Anjaneya Medical Trust v. CIT
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) may have misinterpreted 'income' as 'receipts' and that the arrangement for hiring premises on a no-profit-no-loss basis needed fresh examination. The Tribunal also noted that the predo...
- Gadre Foundation, Ratnagiri vs Commissioner of Income-Tax, (Exemption)…Pune12 Sept 2019Remanded
Also relies on Sree Anjaneya Medical Trust v. CIT
The Tribunal held that the CIT (Exemptions) is required to satisfy himself about the genuineness of activities and the charitable nature of objects, but not to examine the application of income at the stage of registrati...
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026