DCIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI vs. SHRI RAVINDRA KUMAR SINHA, RANCHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 176/RAN/2019Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi24 August 2020AY 2015-165 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the onus is on the Assessing Officer to establish that a liability has ceased or remitted for Section 41(1) to apply. Since the assessee had not obtained any benefit by way of remission or cessation of liability, and the CIT(A)'s order was factually correct, the appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 1,61,95,176/- on account of sundry creditors and advances, invoking Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to provide complete details of the creditors. The CIT(A) deleted this addition.

What were the issues?

Whether Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is applicable to sundry creditors and advances when the liability has neither ceased nor been remitted. Whether the AO discharged the onus to prove cessation or remission of liability.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 41(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI, ‘E’COURT, AT KOLKATA

Before: Shri S.S, Godara, JM & Dr. A.L. Saini, AM

For Appellant: Shri A. K. Mohanti, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
For Respondent: Shri R. K. Khushal, AR
Hearing: 22/07/2020Pronounced: 24/08/2020

आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant-DCIT, Circle-1, Ranchi 2. ��यथ�/Respondent- Shri Ravindra Kumar Sinha 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय �"त"न�ध, आयकर अपील%य अ�धकरण / DR, ITAT, 6. गाड) फाइल / Guard file.

//True Copy// By order/आदेश से,

Sr. Private Secretary

More judgments on Section 41(1)

All 1,943 judgments and leading authorities on Section 41(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →