PAWAN CASTING (MEGHALAYA) PRIVATE LIMITED,BYRNIHAT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, GUWAHATI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the CIT(A)'s ex parte order was unsustainable and violated principles of natural justice. The CIT(A) was duty-bound to adjudicate the appeal on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex parte without considering the merits of the case. The CIT(A) had given three opportunities, but the assessee did not appear.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex parte without adjudicating on merits, and if the order violated principles of natural justice.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GUWAHATI BENCH, “E
Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Dr. A. L. Saini, AM]
ORDER
Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM
1. This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati dated 16-01-2019 for the AY 2010-11.
At the outset, the ld.AR drew our attention to the fact that the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) is an ex parte order without going into the merits of the case. The ld. AR before us undertakes to be present before the ld. CIT(A), if an opportunity is given to him. We note that according to the ld. CIT(A) three (3) opportunities were given and since the assessee did not turn up before him, the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of assessee without going into the merits of the case, which action of the ld. CIT(A) cannot be countenanced. Since the assessee has a statutory right to file an appeal before the First appellate authority (ld. CIT-A) according to us, the ld. CIT(A) was duty bound to adjudicate the appeal on merits. The action of ld. CIT(A) is also bad for violation of natural justice and therefore, the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) is set aside and we direct the ld. AR of the assessee to diligently appear before the ld. CIT(A) when the matter is listed for further Pawan Casting (Meghalaya) P.Ltd. hearing and/ or to file written submissions along with supporting documents if necessary. And The ld. CIT(A) is directed to decide the appeal on merits after giving adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee and pass a speaking order.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 17th June, 2020.
Sd/- Sd/- (Dr. A. L. Saini) (Aby. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated : 17th June, 2020 **PP(Sr.P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to:
Appellant – M/s. Pawan Casting (Meghalaya) Private Limited, Harlibagan, Byrnihat, Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya-793101.
Respondent – Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Officer, Circle-4, 5th 2 Fl., Aaykar Bhawan, G.S Road, Guwahati-781005. 3. CIT(A),Guwahati-2, Guwahati, 4. CIT Guwahati
DR, ITAT, Guwahati.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026