SHREE MAHESH CHARITABLE SANSTHA,NASHIK vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 660/PUN/2019Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 February 20203 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application based on inadequate documentation. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT (Exemptions) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application due to a lack of required details and documents.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT (Exemptions) was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AA solely on the grounds of inadequate documentation without providing sufficient opportunity.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Hearing: 04.02.2020Pronounced: 05.02.2020

ORDER

PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the CIT (Exemptions), Pune dated 28.03.2019 u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Act.

2.

Before us, at the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee mentioned that the Trust was incorporated on 24th August, 1994 and applying for registration u/s 12AA of the Act only on 25.09.2018. Mentioning that the CIT (Exemptions) rejected the said application of the assessee for want of details, ld. Counsel submitted that the matter may be remanded to his file once again 2 for fresh adjudication. Further, accepting the inadequate representation and also inadequacy in furnishing of documents, which are required for the CIT (Exemptions), ld. Counsel made statement at bar in this regard for complete compliance this time. 3. On hearing both the sides and perusing the order of the CIT (Exemptions), we find the CIT (Exemptions) rejecting the application initially for want of documents. The contents of para 6 of the order of the CIT (Exemptions) are relevant and the same are extracted hereunder :- “6. Therefore, the applicant trust has not furnished details/evidences on the ITBA portal or otherwise to process the application for granting registration u/s 12AA of the Act. In view of above facts of the case and absence of the requisite details, I am not satisfied about the charitable nature of objects as well as the genuineness of activities of the trust/institution and therefore, the request for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be accepted.” 4. The above contents of para 6 of the CIT (Exemptions)’s order support the adjudication of the issue based on inadequate documentation and it calls for one more round of proceedings before the CIT (Exemptions). Accordingly, without going into the merits of the case, we remand the issue to the file of the CIT (Exemptions) for one more for fresh adjudication. The CIT (Exemptions) shall decide the same after granting reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee in accordance with set principles of natural justice. Assessee shall comply with the CIT as per the law. Thus, the relevant ground raised by the assessee in this appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →