SHREE MAHESH CHARITABLE SANSTHA,NASHIK vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application based on inadequate documentation. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT (Exemptions) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application due to a lack of required details and documents.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT (Exemptions) was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AA solely on the grounds of inadequate documentation without providing sufficient opportunity.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM
ORDER
PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the CIT (Exemptions), Pune dated 28.03.2019 u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Act.
Before us, at the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee mentioned that the Trust was incorporated on 24th August, 1994 and applying for registration u/s 12AA of the Act only on 25.09.2018. Mentioning that the CIT (Exemptions) rejected the said application of the assessee for want of details, ld. Counsel submitted that the matter may be remanded to his file once again 2 for fresh adjudication. Further, accepting the inadequate representation and also inadequacy in furnishing of documents, which are required for the CIT (Exemptions), ld. Counsel made statement at bar in this regard for complete compliance this time. 3. On hearing both the sides and perusing the order of the CIT (Exemptions), we find the CIT (Exemptions) rejecting the application initially for want of documents. The contents of para 6 of the order of the CIT (Exemptions) are relevant and the same are extracted hereunder :- “6. Therefore, the applicant trust has not furnished details/evidences on the ITBA portal or otherwise to process the application for granting registration u/s 12AA of the Act. In view of above facts of the case and absence of the requisite details, I am not satisfied about the charitable nature of objects as well as the genuineness of activities of the trust/institution and therefore, the request for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be accepted.” 4. The above contents of para 6 of the CIT (Exemptions)’s order support the adjudication of the issue based on inadequate documentation and it calls for one more round of proceedings before the CIT (Exemptions). Accordingly, without going into the merits of the case, we remand the issue to the file of the CIT (Exemptions) for one more for fresh adjudication. The CIT (Exemptions) shall decide the same after granting reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee in accordance with set principles of natural justice. Assessee shall comply with the CIT as per the law. Thus, the relevant ground raised by the assessee in this appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026