NATIONAL ACADEMY OF CONSTRUCTION,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1166/HYD/2017Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 November 2020AY 2012-134 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the principles of natural justice were violated. Therefore, all appeals, both by the assessee and the Revenue, were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed multiple appeals against various assessment orders. The assessee contended that they were not provided with a proper opportunity to be heard by the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A). The Revenue conceded to this point.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was denied a proper opportunity of being heard by the lower authorities, leading to a violation of natural justice.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD

Before: SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY

For Appellant: Shri C.S. Subrahmanyam &, Shri V. Siva Kumar
For Respondent: Shri Ashok Kardam, DR
Hearing: 20/11/2020Pronounced: 06/11/2020

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No.834/Hyd/2013
ITA No.2087/Hyd/2017

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

(AY: 2009-10) Asst. Director of Income Tax Vs. National Academy of (Exemptions)-I, Construction, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN: AAAAN 0794 M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri C.S. Subrahmanyam & Shri V. Siva Kumar Revenue by: Shri Ashok Kardam, DR Date of hearing: 20/11/2020 Date of pronouncement: 06/11/2020 ORDER PER Bench:

1.

The Assessee has filed appeals against the order Ld. CIT (A)-IV in & 432/AD(E)-I/CIT(A)/IV-11-12 dated 21/3/2013 for the AY 2008-09 & 2009-10 and in ITA No. NIL, dated 28/8/2014 for the AY 2010-11 & 2011-12 and against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-9, Hyderabad in ITA No. 0019/DCIT(Exe)/2015-16, dated 28/03/2017 for the AY 2012- 13 and in ITA No.0005/ACIT(Exemptions)/2016-17, dated 07/07/2017 for the AY 2013-14 and in ITA No. 0304/ACIT (Exemptions)/2016-17 dated 21/7/2017 for the AY 2014-15. The Revenue has also filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT (A) in ITA No. 259 & 432/ AD(E)- I/CIT(A)/IV-11-12 dated 21/3/2013 for the AY 2008-09.

2.

At the outset, the Ld. AR submitted before us that the Ld. Assessing Officer has not provided proper opportunity to the assessee of being heard. The Ld. AR further submitted that the Ld. CIT (A) though called for a remand report from the Ld. AO had also failed to provide proper opportunity to the assessee of being heard. It was therefore pleaded that the matter may be remitted back to the file of the ld. AO so that the assessee may be in a position to effectively pursue its appeals, otherwise great injustice will be inflicted on the assessee. The ld. DR could not successfully controvert to the submission of the ld. AR, however he conceded that if the appeals of the assessee are being remitted back to the file of the ld. AO, then the appeal of the Revenue may also be remitted back to the file of the ld. AO to decide the matter afresh.

3.

After hearing both the sides, We are of the considered view that the appeals of the assessee as well as of the Revenue have to be remitted back to the file of the ld. AO for fresh consideration as it appears that the principles of natural justice are violated. Therefore, in the interest of justice, We hereby admit the additional grounds raised by the assessee in all its appeals and further remit all the appeals back to the file of Ld. AO for de-novo consideration and further direct the Ld. Revenue Authorities to admit any fresh evidence filed by the assessee and after considering the same and after providing property opportunity to the assessee and its Counsel of being heard, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and merit.

4.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as well as the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes.

Pronounced in the open Court on the Sixth November, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →