RUSTOM JEHANGIR COOPER CHARITY TRUST,PUNE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee had uploaded the required documents, but the CIT (Exemption) failed to utilize the information. Therefore, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application for want of details and non-furnishing of information on the ITBA portal.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration under Section 12AA was justified when the assessee had complied with the information requirements, and if the CIT (Exemption) failed to consider the provided information.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM
ORDER
PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the CIT (Exemption), Pune dated 11.07.2019 u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Act.
Before us, at the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee mentioned that the Trust was incorporated on 21st November, 2006 and applied for registration u/s 12AA of the Act only on 16.01.2019. Mentioning that the CIT (Exemption) rejected the said application of the assessee for want of details, ld. Counsel submitted that the matter may be remanded to his file once again for fresh adjudication.
We have heard both sides and perused the material available on record. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the registration merely on the ground of non furnishing of documents/information by the assessee to study the bonafides of the objects of the assessee’s Trust. We further find that the assessee responded to the queries raised by the CIT (Exemption) and uploaded the requisite documents/information on the ITBA portal of the Department. Despite reply from the assessee side, CIT (Exemption) could not make use of the same for one reason or others. In the order of CIT dated 11.07.2019, it was categorically held that the assessee failed to upload the requisite information in ITBA portal. The relevant contents in para 5 of CIT (Exemption)’s order are extracted hereunder :- “5. In view of the above, the applicant trust has not furnished requisite details on the ITBA portal or complied the notices issued dated 06/03/2019 to process the application for granting registration u/s 12AA of the Act. Therefore, I am not satisfied about the charitable nature of objects as well as the genuineness of activities of the trust / institution and therefore, the request for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be accepted.”
On hearing both the sides and perusing the order of the CIT (Exemption), we find that it is a case of compliance by the assessee by uploading successfully of the documents required for adjudication of the application for registration. Further, we find that it is failure on the part of CIT (Exemption) to make use of the said information. Considering the same, we are of opinion that there is violence of the principles of natural justice in matters of non furnishing of information which is already furnished/uploaded by the assessee. 5. Therefore, we are of the view that the matter should be remanded to the file of CIT (Exemption) once again for fresh adjudication. Accordingly,
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026