RAMESH CHANDRA PATEL (HUF),HYDERABAD vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), HYDERABAD

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD ‘SMC-B’ BENCH : Hyderabad

Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi

Hearing: 03/12/2020Pronounced: 03/12/2020

Date of Hearing : 03/12/2020 Date of Pronouncement : 03/12/2020 O R D E R This is assessee’s appeal filed against the order of CIT(A)-1, Hyderabad dated 09.06.2017 relating to A.Y. 2009-10 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This appeal was taken up for hearing through Video Conference on 03.12.2020 and both the parties were heard.

The Ld.AR for the assessee has submitted withdrawal application dated 03.12.2020 stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the A.Y. under consideration under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. He further submitted that an application to this effect has been filed by the assessee and that the assessee has also received Form- 3.

The Ld.DR has no objection to the same. ./2017 Ramesh Chandra Patel (HUF) AY 2009-10 4. In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal as Pr.CIT has issued Form-3.

However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned A.Y. is not ultimately resolved in terms of the afore-stated Act, the appellant (i.e. the assessee) is at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriate as per law. The Ld.DR for the revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.

RAMESH CHANDRA PATEL (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), HYDERABAD