CYIENT LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as it had opted for the "Vivad se Vishwas" scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstatement if the scheme application was rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Cyient Ltd, filed an appeal for AY 2012-13. The assessee subsequently availed the benefit of the "Vivad se Vishwas" scheme and requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee due to opting for the "Vivad se Vishwas" scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony
This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2012-13 against the draft assessment order of the Dy.CIT, Circle 1(2) and the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C of the I.T. Act Hyderabad, dated 13-12-2016.
At the outset, the Ld. AR submitted before us that the assessee does not want to pursue the appeal as it has already availed the benefit of “vivad se vishwas” scheme wherein its application was accepted. Therefore, consequent to the same, the assessee desires to withdraw the appeal before the Tribunal. Hence it was pleaded, that the appeal of the assessee may be treated as withdrawn.
The Ld. DR conceded to the request of the Ld. AR.
After hearing both the parties, according to the request of the assessee and its Ld. AR, we hereby allow the appeal of the assessee to be withdrawn. We also make it clear that the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal within the stipulated time as provided under the Act, in order to reinstate the appeal, if the application with respect to Vivad se Vishwas scheme is rejected.
In the result, appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 10th December, 2020.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026