L/H MOHANLAL B. SHAH, LATE NARESH B.SHAH,SANGLI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (2), SANGLI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the outstanding balances were indeed loan liabilities and not trading liabilities. Therefore, the provisions of Section 41(1) were not applicable.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer treated outstanding credit balances in the assessee's books as a remission of trading liability under Section 41(1) and made additions. The assessee contended these were loan liabilities, not trading liabilities.
What were the issues?
Whether the outstanding credit balances represented a remission of trading liability or a loan liability for the purpose of Section 41(1).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश की प्रनिनलनप अग्रेनषि / Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपऩलधर्थी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent; 3. आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT (Appeals)-1, Kolhapur 4. The Pr. CIT-1, Kolhapur नवभधगऩय प्रनिनिनर्, आयकर अपऩलऩय अनर्करण, पपणे “SMC” / 5. DR „SMC‟, ITAT, Pune; गधर्ा फधईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशधिपसधर/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
Date 1. Draft dictated on 11-06-2020 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 11-06-2020 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed -- JM before the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved -- JM by Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to Sr.PS the Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement Sr.PS on 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *
More judgments on Section 41(1)
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 328/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 327/AGR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 326/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 325/AGR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Morlidhar B Vamdote, Bardoli vs ITO, Ward-1, BardoliITA 1174/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026