BHANDA LARGE SIZED MULTIPURPOSE CO-OP SOCEITY LIMITED,KEONJHAR vs. ITO, KEONJHAR

Grounds taken by the assessee in both the appeals are common and Grounds taken by the assessee in both the appeals are common and Grounds taken by the assessee in both the appeals are common and identical i.e. claim of deduction u/s.80P(2)(d)(i) of the Act, therefore, both the identical i.e. claim of deduction u/s.80P(2)(d)(i) of the Act, therefore, both the identical i.e. claim of deduction u/s.80P(2)(d)(i) of the Act, therefore, both the appeals are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for appeals are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for appeals are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of conven the sake of convenience.

As a lead case, the facts of the assessee for the assessment year 2011 As a lead case, the facts of the assessee for the assessment year 2011 As a lead case, the facts of the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is taken for adjudication is taken for adjudication and the decision will apply mutatis and the decision will apply mutatis-mutandis to the assessment year 2012 assessment year 2012-13.

Ld counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has earne Ld counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has earne Ld counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has earned the impugned income of Rs.9,58,097/ impugned income of Rs.9,58,097/- during the financial year 2010 during the financial year 2010-2011 relevant to P a g e 1 | 3 & 141/CTK/2019 Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 assessment year 2011-12 on the deposits made with Keonjhar Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. (KCCB). Ld counsel for the assessee also submitted that as per the guidelines of the assessee society, the assessee invested their funds with KCCB and the bank has paid interest thereon, which is exempt from tax under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Ld counsel also drew my attention to the certificates issued by deposit bank i.e. KCCB dated 24.1.2020 certifying that interest has been paid for the financial years 2010-11 & 2011-12, relevant to assessment years 2011-12 & 2012-13 and another certificate dated 29.1.2020 and submitted that the claim of the assessee is quite sustainable and tenable and, therefore, same may kindly be allowed.

Replying to above, ld DR submitted that from the assessment order para 4, it is clearly discernible that the assessee has not submitted these certificates during assessment proceedings before the AO for supporting its claim u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act. Therefore, the claim of the assessee cannot be allowed at this belated stage by considering the additional evidence.

Placing rejoinder to above, ld counsel submitted that the certificate issued by the deposit cooperative bank are very relevant and vital for sustenance of the claim of the assessee u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, which cannot be discarded at the threshold without any reason and, therefore, same may kindly be shown to the AO for examination and verification and for which, the assessee has no serious objection.

On careful consideration of the rival submissions, first of all, I note that ld D.R. in all fairness, submitted that if it is just and proper to remit the issue back to P a g e 2 | 3 & 141/CTK/2019 Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 the file of the AO for examination and verification of the certificates for claim of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, then the department has no serious objection after allowing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Hence, I restore the matter to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication of the issue as per law and on the basis of certificates to be produced by the assessee in support of the claim.

Since the facts are similar to the assessment year 2012-13, we also restore the issue to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication after considering the certificates to be produced by the assessee.

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.