ACIT CIRCLE-12(1), NEW DELHI vs. INDIAN STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVES LTD, NOIDA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act leads to the deemed withdrawal of pending appeals. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). The assessee filed an application for withdrawal of the appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, having arrived at a settlement.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal pending before the ITAT is deemed withdrawn upon issuance of a settlement certificate under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI & SH. ANUBHAV SHARMA
This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the appellate order dated 25.02.2020 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 44, New Delhi.
Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Ltd. 2
Heard and perused the record. An application has been filed, for withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee, in furtherance of settlement arrived under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (The Act of 2020).
On behalf of the appellant, from Form 5 under the Act of 2020 has been placed on record.
The sub section (2) of section 4 of the Act of 2020 provides that on issuance of certificate under sub section (1) of section 5 by the designated authority the appeal pending before this tribunal shall be deemed to have been withdrawn from the date on which the said certificate is issued.
In the light of aforesaid, the appeal in hand stands dismissed.
However, subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of The Act of 2020, the revenue shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application, appropriately as per law.
Order pronounced in the open court on 2nd November, 2022.
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026