SHRI SUDHIR JAIN PROP. M/S. SALASAR TRADING CO. 8 SARVESHWAR NAGAR LOHA KHAN, AJMER,AJMER vs. ITO WARD-2(1), AJMER, WARD-2(1) AJMER
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal as the matter was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2014-15. The assessee later filed a petition under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' to settle the matter.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,’B’ JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 877/JP/2019
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,’B’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 877/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2014-15 cuke Shri Sudhir Jain, Income-Tax Officer, Vs. Prop. M/s Salasar Trading Co., Ward 2(1), Ajmer 8, Sarveshwar Nagar, LohaKhan, Ajmer ToLFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.:ABDPJ6201A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: Sh. Sunil Porwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 22/10/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 22/10/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M.
The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A), Ajmer dated 15.05.2019 for the assessment year 2014-15.
The ld A/R has stated that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has been accepted and Form 5 has been issued on 05.08.2020 by the Designated Authority and which has been received by the assessee. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. 2 Sh. Sudhir Jain, Ajmer vs. ITO, Ward 2(1), Ajmer 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.
In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 22/10/2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Firoz @ Firoz Khan vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 15 Oct 2026