MAHESHWARI LOGISTICS LIMITED,VAPI vs. THE PR. CIT, VALSAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's applications to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed two appeals before the ITAT against orders passed under section 263 of the Act. During the hearing, the assessee sought permission to withdraw these appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw their appeals filed before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Honble & SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Honble
सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date of hearing: 05.11.2020 उ�घोषणाक�तार�ख/Pronouncement on: 05.11.2020 आदेश /O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JM: 1. These two appeals by the Assessee are directed against the separate orders of Ld.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Valsad under section 263 of the Act dated 10.03.2017 and 17.03.2017 for the assessment years 2012-13 and 2014-15 respectively.
During the hearing of appeal, the ld.Authorised Representative(AR) for the assessee submits that the assessee has filed applications dated 29.10.2020 in both the appeals for seeking permission to withdraw the appeals and he may be allow to withdraw the same.
On the other hand, Ld.Senior Departmental Representative(Sr.DR) did not object to the plea of the assessee.
Maheshwari Logistics Ltd. Vs. PCIT, Valsad/ ITA No’s.1048 & 1049/AHD/2017 for A.Y’s. 2012-13 & 14-15
Considering the contents of the applications dt 29.10.2020 filed by assessee and the submissions of Ld.Authorised Representative, both appeals of assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 05-11-2020 at the time of hearing.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026