ITO, WAR-1(3), ALWAR vs. SMT. URMILA DEVI, ALWAR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee's dispute settlement petition under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme was accepted. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2014-15. The assessee had filed a petition under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' which was accepted.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee's successful settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 95/JP/2020
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 95/JP/2020 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2014-15 cuke The ITO, Smt. Urmila Devi Vs. Ward-1(3), 10, Lakhanda Kua Behine Old Alwar. Power House, Alwar. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ABNPD6105F vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Dheeraj Board (C.A.) a lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 12/11/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 15/11/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. The Revenue has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A), Alwar dated 18.01.2019 for the assessment year 2014-15.
The ld A/R has stated at the Bar that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has recently been accepted and Form 3 has been issued on 25.08.2021 by the competent authority. It was
The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection as the declaration of the assessee to settle the dispute has been accepted by the Competent Authorities.
In view of above, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026