BBC GLOBAL NEWS LTD. (EARLIER KNWON AS BBC WORLD NEWS LTD.),NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the MAP resolution.
What were the facts?
The assessee had invoked the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) under the DTAA. A resolution was arrived at regarding the assessment of income. The assessee wished to withdraw its appeal based on this resolution.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee after a resolution under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) of the DTAA has been reached.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘FRIDAY-D’ Bench : NEW DELHI
This appeal by the Assessee for the assessment year 2016-17 is directed against the Order of the Learned Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle Int. Taxation 1(1)(2), New Delhi.
None appeared on behalf of the Assessee before us at the time of hearing. However, the Ld. Authorised Signatory of the Assessee Company vide his letter dated 13.12.2022 has submitted that the assessee had earlier invoked the provisions of Article 27 – Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) of the DTAA and filed an application in this regard with the Competent Authority of UK on 10th (AY 2016-17) BBC GLOBAL NEWS LTD. VS. DCIT July, 2019. It was further submitted in the aforesaid letter that Resolution under MAO has been arrived at with respect to the assessment of income of the assessee, as per the provision of Section 90 of the Act read with Article 27 of DTAA. To support this contention, a copy of communication of Resolution under MAP, dated 25th November, 2022 issued by the Foreign Tax & Tax Research Division-I(1), Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi has been filed which is placed on record. In this backdrop, the assessee wishes to withdraw its appeal for AY 2016- 17.
Ld. Sr. DR did not oppose the aforesaid prayer of the assessee’s authorized signatory made vide letter dated 13.12.2022.
In view of the above factual matrix, we deem it proper to allow the request of the assessee’s authorized signatory for withdrawal of the captioned appeal and the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
Resultantly, the captioned appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 23rd December, 2022.
More judgments on Section 90
- Amar Rameshkumar Bhalodia, Rajkot vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1), RajkotITA 641/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Fireeye Ireland Limited, Ireland vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 1431/DEL/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Archana Gupta, New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3123/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Shishir Dhatwalia, Hamirpur vs Circle 1(1) Jalpaiguri, JalpaiguriITA 2583/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Raghava Gupta Valiveti, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer Ward 5(3)(4), BangaloreITA 2744/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026