OLAVA SAMAJIK VIKAS SANSTHA,RAIGAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 548/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 May 20233 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the information was indeed uploaded by the assessee. Therefore, the CIT's rejection based on non-receipt of information was incorrect.

What were the facts?

The assessee trust applied for approval under Section 80G(5)(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application for not uploading certain required information.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT (Exemption) erred in rejecting the approval application without considering the uploaded information by the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE

Before: SHRI S. S. GODARA & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO

For Appellant: Shri Ajinkya M. Vaishampayan
For Respondent: Shri J. P. Chandraker
Hearing: 23.05.2023Pronounced: 24.05.2023

ORDER

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →