DR BALASAHEB SAVANT NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT, SINDHUDURG,SINDHUDURG vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-1, KUNDAL, KUNDAL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 535/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 May 2023AY 2017-183 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal found that the NFAC had discussed incorrect facts and had not adjudicated the appeal on merits. Therefore, the matter was remanded to the NFAC for a fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest income from nominal members. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, and the appeal was dismissed by the NFAC for non-prosecution.

What were the issues?

Whether the NFAC correctly adjudicated the appeal, and if not, whether the matter should be remanded for de novo consideration on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 143(3),Section 69

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO

For Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Hearing: 24.05.2023Pronounced: 29.05.2023

ORDER

More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

All 2,347 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(a)(i) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →