RAHUL ARUNCHAND JAIN,DHULE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, DHULE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 390/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 July 2023AY 2014-153 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the NFAC was justified in not condoning the significant delay as the assessee failed to provide proper reasons. Consequently, the appeal lacked merit.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the NFAC with a delay of 1488 days, claiming exemption for interest on agricultural land compensation. The NFAC dismissed the appeal in limine due to insufficient reasons for condonation of delay.

What were the issues?

Whether the NFAC was justified in dismissing the appeal on grounds of limitation due to the assessee's failure to adequately explain the delay in filing.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Hearing: 21.06.2023Pronounced: 05.07.2023

ORDER

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →