AHMEDNAGAR CANCER SOCIETY AHMEDNAGAR,AHMEDNAGAR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering that Income Tax laws are welfare legislations and in the interest of justice, decided to provide one final opportunity to the assessee to submit the required details and present their case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Ahmednagar Cancer Society, applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application because the assessee failed to provide clarifications and supporting evidence regarding the genuineness of its objects and charitable activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the registration application without granting a final opportunity to the assessee to furnish supporting evidence for its charitable activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE „A‟ BENCHES:: PUNE
Ahmednagar Cancer Soceity, vs CIT (Exemption), Pune. A/P Flot No. 102, Riyatej Apartment, TP No. 04, Fularimala Savedi, Ahmednagar -414003 PAN: AAETA 9466 E Appellant Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Nitin Waghmore, CIT DR Date of hearing : 22/12/2023 Date of pronouncement : 22/12/2023 ORDER
Per PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM:
This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune (for short, „CIT(E)‟), dated 27.09.2023 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
That, on perusal of the grounds of appeal, it is evident that solitary grievance of the assessee is the rejection of registration to the assessee-trust u/sec. 12AB of the Act by the ld. CIT(E).
2.1 At the time of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. The submissions of the ld. DR and materials/documents available on record were considered and the case was heard on merits. Ahmednagar Cancer Society 2.2 That, on perusal of the order of ld. CIT(E), certain details were called for from the assessee to verify the genuineness of the objects of the assessee-trust and to ascertain the genuineness of the charitable activities done by the applicant-trust. There were opportunities given by the Department to the assessee for submission of supporting evidences to demonstrate the charitable activities performed by the trust. However, at para 6, the ld. CIT(E) mentions that assessee had not furnished any clarification/justification on the issues raised vide show-cause notice dated 04/09/2023, hence, presumed that assessee has nothing to say further in the matter. Therefore, at para 7, ld.CIT(E) held that it was not possible to arrive at satisfactory conclusion about the genuineness of the activities and compliance of requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust/institution, the application of the assessee was rejected.
We are of the considered view that it is a case where the application for registration of a trust was filed by the assessee, and for want of supporting evidences, the matter was rejected by the Department. It has to be appreciated that the purpose of the provisions for registration of trust u/sec. 12AB and granting of exemption u/sec. 80G, all these sections derives their spirit from the Directive Principles of State Policy enshrined in the Constitution of India. Since, the Govt. of India makes endeavor to provide welfare to one and all in the society at large and in view thereof the registration Ahmednagar Cancer Society for public charitable trusts are given in order to ensure that through these charitable trusts benefits should flow to the entire society wherefrom various charitable activities, the entire society is benefited and the objectives of the Govt. of India in furtherance to the Directive Principles of State Policy are achieved. These provisions for the trust registration u/sec. 12A and granting of exemption u/sec. 80G enhance the socio economic welfare in the society. Furthermore, the Income Tax laws are welfare legislations and not penal in nature. Therefore, in the interest of justice and considering all the afore-stated observations, we are of the considered view that one final opportunity should be provided to the assessee to file the relevant details before the ld. CIT(E) and present their case on merits. In view thereof, we set aside the order of the ld. CIT(E) and remit the matter back to his file with the aforesaid direction and the ld. CIT(E) shall re-adjudicate as per law complying with the principles of natural justice. Grounds of appeal stands allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open Court on 22nd December, 2023.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026