KNOWLEDGE TRUST,BARUNEI TEMPLE ROAD, KHORDHA vs. DCIT(E) CIRCLE, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 180/CTK/2024Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack24 June 2024AY 2024-253 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that a CBDT circular extended the due date for filing Form No. 10AB. Therefore, the order of the CIT(E) was set aside and the issue was restored for readjudication, considering the application as within time.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an application in Form No. 10AB seeking registration under Section 80G(5). The CIT(E) rejected the application as it was filed beyond the prescribed time limit as per the Finance Act, 2020. The assessee contended that a CBDT circular extended the filing deadline.

What were the issues?

Whether the application for registration under Section 80G(5) was time-barred, considering the subsequent CBDT circular extending the filing deadline.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK

Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL

Hearing: 24/06/2024Pronounced: 24/06/2024

O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 01.03.2024, passed by the CIT(Exemption), Hyderabad in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2023-24/1061817648(1).

2.

It was submitted by the ld. AR that the assessee had filed an application electronically in Form No.10AB seeking registration u/s.80G(5) of the Act. It was the submission that the Form No.10AC was also issued for registration u/s.80G(5) by the department in favour of the assessee. However, the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application of the assessee filed in form 10AB for registration observing that the same is filed beyond the prescribed time limit as per the Finance Act, 2020. It was the submission that the order of the ld. CIT(E) deserves to be reversed.

3.

Ld. CIT-DR submitted that the ld. CIT(E) has rightly denied the registration u/s.80G(5) of the Act as the application of the assessee- Finance Act, 2020. Thus, it was the prayer that the order of the ld. CIT(E) deserves to be upheld.

4.

We have considered the rival submissions. On perusal of the order of the ld. CIT(E) clearly shows that the application of the assessee filed in Form No.10AB for registration has been rejected. Further a perusal of the impugned order clearly shows that the ld. CIT(E) had issued a show cause notice to the assessee which has not been replied by the assessee. However, ld. AR of the assessee before us submitted that the CBDT vide Circular No.7/2024, dated 25.04.2024 has extended the date of filing Form No.10AB upto 30th June, 2024, whereas the assessee has filed its application in Form No.10AB on 27.09.2023. Under similar circumstances in the case of Bhoomishri Public Charitable Trust, passed in the coordinate bench of the Tribunal has already taken a view as follows :- 5. We have heard rival contentions and perused the material available on record. From the order of the ld. CIT(E), it appears that the application of the assessee was rejected solely on the ground that the Form 10AB was filed beyond the prescribed time limit as provided by the Finance Act, 2020. The CBDT Circular No.7/2024 has addressed this issue by which the time limit for filing Form 10AB is extended upto 30.06.2024. Since in this case, the order has already been passed by the Pr.CIT rejecting the application filed by the assessee, normally we would have set aside the order of the ld. CIT(E) and direct the assessee to file a fresh application in view of the Circular issued by the CBDT, referred to supra. This would only lead to multiple filings before the ld. CIT(E). This being so, in view of the Circular issued by the CBDT and also being live to the Circular issued by the CBDT in para 4.1, we set aside the order of the ld. CIT(E) and restore the issues to the file of ld.CIT(E) to readjudicate the issue holding the application of the assessee as being within time in view of the above mentioned Circular.

More judgments on Section 80G(5)

All 2,236 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →