ODISHA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal corrected the assessment years to 2014-15 & 2015-16. It also directed the AO to apply a net profit rate of 2.25% on the total turnover, instead of the 5% or 8% previously applied by the AO.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum to a previous ITAT order. The original order had a typographical error in mentioning the assessment years and the profit percentage applied by the AO. The corrigendum rectifies these errors.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was a typographical error in the previous order regarding assessment years and the profit rate applied by the Assessing Officer.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
order of the Tribunal dated 25th July, 2024 in & 201/CTK/2024 for the Tribunal dated 25 July, 2024 in & 201/CTK/2024 for the assessment years assessment years 2014-2015 and 2015-16 that while disposing of the while disposing of the captioned appeal captioned appeals in cause title the assessment year 2014 cause title the assessment year 2014-15 has not been mentioned and in p mentioned and in para 10 in line 7, the profit percentage as applied by the 7, the profit percentage as applied by the AO is mentioned at 5 AO is mentioned at 5% as against 8%. The error is rectified as under: The error is rectified as under: “In cause title, the Assessment Years be read as “In cause title, the Assessment Years be read as “In cause title, the Assessment Years be read as “2014-14 & 2015- 16” Para 10 of the order be read as under: Para 10 of the order be read as under:
P a g e 1 | 2 & 201/CTK/2024 Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2015-16 filed for the assessment year 2015-2016, the facts are identical to the appeal in decided by us hereinabove, wherein we have directed the AO to apply the net profit rate of 2.25% as against the net profit rate applied by the AO @ 5% in that year. In view of the above, in this appeal also, we direct the AO to apply the net profit rate @2.25% on the total turnover declared by the assessee at Rs.13,29,60,450/- as against 8% applied by the AO. We order accordingly.”
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026