LIONS CLUB OF MALEGAON SOUTH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,NASHIK vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 996/PUN/2019Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 August 2020AY 2019-202 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found it proper to remand the matter to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration. The assessee was granted liberty to file supporting evidence for their claims.

What were the facts?

The assessee applied for recognition under Section 80G, but the CIT(Exemption) rejected the application. The assessee failed to produce expenditure details before the CIT(Exemption) due to unavoidable circumstances.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the application for recognition under Section 80G due to non-submission of expenditure details.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R. S. SYAL & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Abhay Shastri
Hearing: 04.08.2020Pronounced: 04.08.2020

PER S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM: The above-said appeal by the assessee is against the order dated 28.06.2019 passed by the CIT(Exemption), Pune for A.Y. 2019-20. 2. The only issue is to be decided as to whether the CIT(Exemption) justified in rejecting the application filed to grant recognition u/s 80G of the Act.

3.

Heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. The contention of the Ld. AR, Shri Abhay Shastri is that the CIT(Exemption) sought details of expenditure from the assessee but however due to unavoidable circumstances the same could not be produced before the 2 authority and prayed to remand the matter to the file of the CIT(Exemption). The Ld. DR, Smt. Kesang Y. Sherpa vehemently opposed the same and submitted that inspite of having given opportunity to the assessee no evidence was so filed before the CIT(Exemption). On perusal of the impugned order, we note that in para 6.3 the assessee claimed expenditure under the head “medical relief” and no evidence in support of which filed. The fact remains admitted that no evidence filed in support of the claim before the CIT(Exemption), but before us Ld. AR for the assessee undertaken that the assessee is ready to file evidences in support of the claim made. Therefore, taking into consideration the submissions of the Ld. AR and the Ld. DR and the facts & circumstances of the case, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration. The assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of his claim. Thus, the grounds raised in this regard are allowed for statistical purposes.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 04th day of August, 2020. (R. S. SYAL) (S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे / Pune; "दनांक / Dated : 04th August, 2020 Sujeet आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant.

1.

""यथ" / The Respondent.

2.3.

The CIT(Exemption), Pune. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “ए” ब"च, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गाड" फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →