SRI.TONY JOSE,KOTTAYAM vs. THE DCIT, KOCHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 703/COCH/2019Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 October 2020AY 2013-143 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal heard the Revenue's representative and noted the assessee's request for withdrawal. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals for assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of these appeals.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw appeals due to opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

For Respondent: Shri B. Sajjive, Sr. DR
Hearing: 05/10/2020Pronounced: 05/10/2020

Per CHANDRA POOJARI, AM These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the different orders of the CIT(A), Kottayam dated 24/09/2019. The relevant assessment years are 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14.

2.

At the time of hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide letter dated 17/08/2020, the assessee has requested for withdrawal of the above appeals since he was opting for settlement of dispute under the Vivad Ke Vishwas Scheme. It was submitted that the assessee had received Form No. 3 from the department confirming the acceptance of settlement under the above scheme.

3.

We have heard the Ld. DR. Since the assessee has requested for withdrawal of the above appeals on account of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the same are dismissed as withdrawn.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →