JAIN SWETAMBAR URTIPUJAK SHREE SANG,PIPAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal believed the assessee deserved one more opportunity to submit the required details and documents. Therefore, the matter was set aside to the CIT(E) for a fresh decision after providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application seeking registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application, stating that the assessee failed to provide necessary documentation despite sufficient opportunities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the registration application without granting a proper opportunity to the assessee to furnish required documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM
ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(E), Jaipur dated 31.08.2020 challenging the rejection of its application seeking registration u/s 12AA of the Act.
Heard both the parties and pursued the material available on record.
On perusal of the order passed by the ld. CIT(E), it is observed that the ld CIT(E) has stated in his order that sufficient opportunities has been provided to the assessee to produce relevant information/documentation in support of its claim seeking registration
2 Jain Swetambar Murtipujak Shree Sang vs. CIT(E) U/s 12AA of the Act. However the assessee has failed to avail of such opportunity, accordingly, the application seeking registration was rejected by ld. CIT(E).
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, we belief that the assessee deserves one more opportunity to submit necessary details and documents in support of its claim for seeking registration U/s 12AA of the Act. Therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play, the matter is hereby set aside to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to decide the same afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
The assessee is also hereby directed to attend to the proceedings before the ld. CIT(E) and ensure in timely completion thereof as so directed by the ld. CIT(E).
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 12/08/2021.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026