ADITYA PROFILE PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ACIT (CPC)- TDS, GHAZIABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn because the issues were settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16. The assessee sought permission to withdraw these appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee could withdraw the appeals due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM
PER BENCH : These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the different orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune (‘CIT(A)’ for short) commonly dated 14.11.2019 for the Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 respectively.
When the matter had come up for hearing today, the appellant filed a letter seeking permission to withdraw the above captioned appeals on the ground that the issues involved in these appeals stand settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The appellant also filed copy of Form No.3 issued by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Pune.
On the other hand, the ld. Department Representative had expressed no objection to permit the withdrawal of the appeals.
In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeals. Accordingly, all the above captioned appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 04th day of November, 2020. (S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (INTURI RAMA RAO) "याियक सद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; "दनांक / Dated : 04th November, 2020. Sujeet आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant.
""यथ" / The Respondent.
The CIT(A)-10, Pune.
The Pr. CCIT, Pune. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “ए” ब"च, 5. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गाड" फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026