SMT. SEEMABEN N. PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2)(5),, AHMEDABAD

The captioned assessee has sought to withdraw the appeal listed above on the ground that assessee has opted to avail benefits of ‘Vivad [Smt. Seemaben N. Patel vs. ITO] A.Y. 2012-13 - 2 - se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ (VSV). When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsels for the assessee at the outset have submitted that he does not seek to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and consequently requested that their applications for withdrawal of appeals may please be granted.

The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.

In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned party, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.