RAMALINGA RAJU GORINTA,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(3), HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 584/HYD/2022Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 August 2023AY 2019-204 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application, recalling the ex parte order. The Tribunal also directed that the appeal be treated as allowed for statistical purposes, granting a final opportunity to the assessee to appear before the CIT(A) and argue the case on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a miscellaneous application to recall an ex parte order passed by the ITAT. The assessee claimed that notices from the Tribunal were sent to an incorrect address, preventing their appearance. The assessee also stated they could not appear before the CIT(A) due to ill health, resulting in an ex parte order there as well.

What were the issues?

Whether an ex parte order passed by the ITAT should be recalled when the assessee demonstrates a lack of proper notice and a willingness to participate. Whether to grant a final opportunity to the assessee to present their case before the CIT(A) after an ex parte order was passed due to ill health.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Rule 24

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”, HYDERABAD

Before: SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY

For Appellant: Shri P. Vinod, AR
For Respondent: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Hearing: 04/08/2023

Heard together (2 matters)

M.A. No. 41/Hyd/2023
ITA No. 584/Hyd/2022

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

आदेश / ORDER PER K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JM: By way of this Miscellaneous Application, assessee requested to recall the Tribunal’s order dated 15/12/2022 for the assessment year 2019-20.

2.

At the outset, learned AR submitted that the assessee has not been residing in the address mentioned in the learned CIT(A)’s order, but for quite some time he has been residing in the address reflected in PAN data base as well as in the income tax portal. According to him, since the proceedings before the learned CIT(A) were on-line, there was no problem, but the notices issued by the Tribunal were sent to the address mentioned in learned CIT(A)’s order, and, therefore, the assessee could not enter appearance, resulted in ex parte disposal of the appeal.

3.

Though the learned DR submitted that there is no due diligence on the part of the assessee, the fact remains that the order dated 15/12/2022 in the appeal is an ex parte one. In view of the proviso to Rule 24 of the Tribunal Rules, in case of ex parte order when the assessee approaches the Tribunal and expresses willingness to participate in the appellate proceedings, it is desirable to give an opportunity to the assessee. In these circumstances, we allow this Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee.

4.

Learned AR submitted that the impugned order in the appeal is also an ex parte order and the assessee could not enter appearance before the commissioner, due to ill-health. He, therefore, prayed that given an opportunity, assessee will appear before the learned CIT(A) and prosecute the case very diligently.

5.

Learned DR vehemently opposed the proposal of the assessee for giving an opportunity to him and submitted that the impugned order clearly speaks that the assessee was afforded many opportunities, but he failed to avail the same. 6. We have gone through the record in the light of the submissions made on either side. No doubt the learned CIT(A) adverted to the facts of the case, but in spite of the same, the impugned order is an ex parte order. Since the assessee expresses his willingness to appear before the learned CIT(A) and get the matter disposed-of on merits, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it just and proper to afford final opportunity to the assessee to appear before the learned CIT(A) and put forth his case. Needless to say that it is the final opportunity to the assessee and after affording such opportunity, learned CIT(A) will dispose- of the appeal on merits.

7.

In the result, Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee is allowed and appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on this the 4th day of August, 2023.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →