NEOVANTAGE INNOVATION PARK PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MN TAKSHILA INDUSTRIEES PVT LTD),HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-16(3), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a specific date mentioned in its previous order was a typographical error. The corrected date is 30th September 2016, as opposed to the erroneously stated 31st August 2016.
What were the facts?
This judgment is a corrigendum to a previous ITAT order. It corrects a typographical error regarding a date, changing it from 31st August 2016 to 30th September 2016 in specific paragraphs and line numbers.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was a clerical error in the date mentioned in the original ITAT order. The correction was made to ensure accuracy in the record.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
CORRIGENDUM We find that there is a typographical error while mentioning the date as 31st August 2016 instead of 30th September 2016 at the places mentioned in the following table in the ITAT Order. Therefore, the date mentioned at the places mentioned in the given table may be read as 30 th September 2016 instead of 31st August 2016. Page Number Paragraph Line Number Number Page 34 Para 25 Line 9 Page 44 Para 33.8 Line 7, 23 and 29 Page 45 and 46 Para 33.9 Line 28, 29 and 30 Page 46 Para 34 Line 5 Sd/- Sd/- (RAMA KANTA PANDA) (LALIET KUMAR) Vice President Judicial Member Hyderabad, Dt. 22.12.2023. *TYNM, SPS Copy to: S.No Addresses 1 Neovantage Innovation Park Private Limited Building-450, Genome Valley, Turkapally(V), Shamirpet Hyderabad-500 078 2 ITO, Ward-16(3), IT Towers, AC Guards, Masab Tank Hyderabad-500 004. DRP-1, Bengaluru 3 4 The DIT- (IT-TP), Hyderabad 5 The Addl.CIT (T.P), Hyderabad DR, ITAT Hyderabad Benches 6 7 Guard File By Order
S.No. Details Date 1 Draft dictated on 22.12.2023 2 Draft placed before author 22.12.2023 Draft proposed & placed before the Second 3 Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement 7 File sent to Bench Clerk 8 Date on which the file goes to Head Clerk 9 Date on which file goes to A.R. 10 Date of Dispatch of order
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026