JIWANRAM SHEODUTTRAI INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD-2(1)(TDS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer. The AO is to re-examine the assessee's contentions regarding short deduction of TDS on professional fees and non-deduction on wages paid to skilled laborers.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order upholding the demand for non-deduction of TDS. The demand was raised for payments made towards professional fees and to skilled laborers, treating the assessee as an assessee in default.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is liable for non-deduction of TDS on professional fees and wages paid to skilled laborers, considering the proviso to Section 201 and prevailing trade practices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad
order : January 16, 2023 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग�, �या�यक सद�य �वारा / Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 29.04.2022 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).
The assessee in this appeal has agitated the action of the CIT(A) in upholding the demand raised by the Assessing Officer on account of non-deduction of TDS u/s 201(1) of the Act and thereby, holding the assessee as assessee in default and thereby, raising the tax demand of Rs.82,990/- and interest of Rs.78,008/- u/s 201(1A) of the Act. Assessment year: 2012-13 Jiwanram Sheoduttrai Industries Pvt. Ltd 3. At the outset the ld. counsel for the assessee, in this respect, has submitted that so far as non-deduction on account of payment of professional fees of Rs.2,88,110/- to Rajesh Kumar Shah & Associates was concerned, it was not a case of non-deduction of TDS but short deduction of TDS. He has further contended that even otherwise the payee had included the said amount in his income tax return and that as per Proviso to section 201, if the payee has furnished his return of income and taken into account the amount of payment made to him without deduction of TDS and has paid the due taxes thereupon and declaration is furnished in this respect then the payer is not liable to be declared as ‘assessee in default’. The ld. counsel has further submitted that so far as the issue relating to non-deduction of TDS paid to Shri Asit Mistri and Shri Umesh Sharma was concerned, both were skilled labourer and the payment was made on account of wages and not as contractors and the assessee was justified in non-deducting of TDS on the wages of the labourer as a matter of prevailing trade practice. The ld. counsel has requested that the matter may be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for examination of the aforesaid factual aspect and pass a fresh assessment order on this issue.
The ld. DR has not objected to the same.
In view of the above, the impugned order of the CIT(A) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer to examine the aforesaid contentions of the assessee and if the contentions of the assessee are found correct, the accordingly grant relief to the assessee. The Assessing Officer will give proper opportunity to the assessee to present his case, thereafter to decide this limited issue afresh.
More judgments on Section 201(1)
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Tmw Fintech Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 30/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- State Bank of India, Guna vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, GwaliorITA 432/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India Regional Business… vs Income Tax Officer, TDS Gwalior, GwaliorITA 420/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Tikamgarh vs Income Tax Officer, TDS ITO (TDS) Gwalior…ITA 411/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026