M/S NSI (INDIA) LTD.,HOWRAH vs. DCIT, CIR. 1(1), KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the dispute was settled, the appeal should be considered withdrawn. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and withdrew its appeal pending before the CIT(A). Despite the withdrawal and acceptance of the scheme by the department, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal when the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and settled the dispute.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
Present for: Appellant by : Shri Piyush Lakhotia, Advocate Respondent by : Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT Date of Hearing : 11.01.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 17.01.2023 O R D E R
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi vide Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1040894101(1) dated 16.03.2022 passed against the assessment order by DCIT, Circle-3(1), Kolkata u/s. 147/143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 18.12.2019.
Shri Piyush Lakhotia, Advocate appeared for the assessee and G. Hukugha Sema, CIT appeared on behalf of the revenue.
Grounds taken by the assessee are reproduced as under:
M/s. NSI (India) Ltd., AY 2012-13 “1. For that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal when the assessee has already opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the appeal was withdrawn and the dispute was settled. 2. for that the action of the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by AO may kindly be deleted and relief be provided to the assessee.”
Brief facts of the case are that assessee had opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and had withdrawn its appeal which was pending before the Ld. CIT(A). Assessee had made a submission on 19.03.2021 before the Ld. CIT(A) vide Acknowledgment No. 19032114497409 wherein the response submitted by it stated that assessee is withdrawing its appeal. Response submitted by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) is extracted as under: “Good Evening Sir. Greetings from NSI India Limited Subject - Withdrawal of appeal. Appellant participated under Vivad Se Viswas Scheme and Filed Form 1 and 2 on 30.11.2020. The same had been accepted and the Learned PCIT-I, Kolkata has Issued Form 3 on 04.02.2021 in this regard. Both Forms arc enclosed for your perusal. Accordingly, appellant is withdrawing this appeal. In view of above, you are requested to close the proceedings and issue a confirmation letter in this regard, if any, at your earliest. With regards. NSI India Ltd.”
Ld. Counsel submitted that without considering this response which was furnished in the course of first appellate proceeding, Ld. CIT(A) proceeded to dismiss the appeal of the assessee by passing the order dated 16.03.2022 which compelled the assessee for filing the present appeal before the Tribunal. Ld. Counsel also referred to Form 5 issued as “order for full and final settlement of tax arrear” u/s. 5(2) read with section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (3 of 2020) The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Rules, 2020 dated 22.12.2021.
Ld. Counsel thus, contended that department has accepted its application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme since assessee has paid the tax towards full and final settlement of tax arrears. Considering the facts on record as stated above wherein assessee has M/s. NSI (India) Ltd., AY 2012-13 deposited the amount of tax arrear as full and final settlement which has been accepted by the department by issuing Form 5 referred above, we allow the ground no. 1 of the assessee to hold that the appeal is withdrawn since the dispute is settled in the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Accordingly, the impugned order of Ld. CIT(A) is set aside. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed as withdrawn under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Order is pronounced in the open court on 17th January, 2023.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026