GAZNA SAMABAYA KRISHI UNNAYAN SAMITI LTD,NADIA vs. PCIT-1, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw their appeal against a Section 263 order, which was granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]
This is the appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. PCIT”] passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) dated 23.03.2021 for the AY 2016-17.
At the time of hearing, a letter dated 8.12.2022 was placed before us from the assessee’s Advocate Shri Partha Sarathi Gupta requesting the Bench to allow the Assessment Year: 2016-17 Gazna Samabaya Krishi Unnayan Samiti Ltd. withdrawal the appeal in view of the order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 263 read with Section 144B of the Act dated 23.02.2022 wherein no disallowance has been made. Accordingly accepting the request of the assessee we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 17th January, 2023
Sd/- Sd/- (Sonjoy Sarma /संजय शमा�) (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश कुमार) Judicial Member/�या�यक सद�य Accountant Member/लेखा सद�य Dated: 17th January, 2023 SB, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- Gazna Samabaya Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd., C/o, Partha Sarathi Gupta, Advocate, 100, Bank Lane, Hatar Para, P.O.-Krishnagar, District-Nadia, Pin-741101 2. Respondent – PCIT-1, Kolkata 3. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026