ALOSHA VANIJYA PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 11(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) order for AY 2011-12 was a nullity due to the wrong assessment year and quashed it. For AY 2012-13, the Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee an opportunity to furnish documents.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders of the CIT(A) for AY 2011-12 and 2012-13. For AY 2011-12, the CIT(A) order inadvertently mentioned the wrong assessment year. For AY 2012-13, the CIT(A) order was ex-parte, and the addition was made under Section 68 for unexplained cash credit.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order is valid when it mentions an incorrect assessment year. Whether an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) should be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
order : March 15, 2023 ORDER Per Manish Borad, Accountant Member: Both these appeals filed by the same assessee pertaining to the Assessment Years 2011-12 & 2012-13 are directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short ld. “CIT(A)”] both dated 14.10.2022 arising out of the order u/s 144/147 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) dated 04.12.2019.
Registry has informed that there is delay of one day in both the appeals. We have gone through the condonation application and are satisfied that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the said delay. We, therefore, condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits.
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that has been filed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)
I.T.A. Nos.722&723/Kol/2022 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 Alosha Vanijya Pvt. Ltd dated 14.10.2022, wherein, the ld. CIT(A) inadvertently mentioned wrong assessment year i.e. A.Y 2011-12, whereas, the order of the Assessing Officer is for assessment year 2012-13. Therefore, prayer was made that the impugned order for assessment year 2011-12 dated 14.10.2022 may be held as infructuous.
So far as, is concerned, the prayer of the assessee was that since the order of the ld. CIT(A) is an ex parte therefore the issue of addition made u/s 68 at Rs.10,00,000/- may be restored for a fresh adjudication to the file of the Assessing Officer.
The ld. Departmental Representative failed to controvert the submissions made by the ld. Counsel for the assessee.
We have heard rival contentions and persued the records. We notice that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in non- banking financial corporation and declared nil income for assessment year 2012-13 for e-return filed on 30.09.2012. The reassessment proceedings carried out after serving notice u/s 148, 143(2) & 142(1) of the act but since the assessee did not file any document, nor replied to any show-cause notice dated 20.11.2019 as stated in the assessment order, the proceedings were concluded after making an addition u/s 68 of the Act for unexplained cash credit at Rs.10,00,000/- received from Sri Suraj Verma. The said addition was challenged by the assessee before the ld. CIT(A). While perusing the records of ITA No.722/Kol/2022, we notice that the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) (NFAC) is dated 14.10.2022 and assessment year mentioned is A.Y 2011-12 and the impugned order bears DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1046300287(1). Prima facie, we notice that the ld. CIT(A) inadvertently mentioned the I.T.A. Nos.722&723/Kol/2022 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 Alosha Vanijya Pvt. Ltd wrong assessment year for which there is no appeal filed by the assessee, therefore, this impugned order is non-est and nullity, liable to be quashed and therefore, appeal of the assessee is allowed. 6.1 Now, so far as ITA No.723/Kol/2022 is concerned, in the impugned order, ld. CIT(A) has correctly mentioned the assessment year 2012-13 and impugned order is bearing DIN and Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1046300089(1) and is dated 14.10.2022. However, on perusal of the impugned order, we find it is an ex parte order and since the assessee did not comply before the Assessing Officer and nor complied to any of the notices, the appeal was dismissed, the assessment order dated 04.12.2019 is framed as best judgment u/s 144 r.w.s 147 of the Act. The ld. Assessing Officer has observed that the assessee neither submitted any document nor filed any reply to the show-cause notice dated 20.11.2019. On the other hand, the ld. Counsel for the assessee referring to the paper-book, submitted that reply was given on 03.08.2019 to the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act. Again a reply dated 25.11.2019 raising objections, against the reasons to belief, were also filed. Considering the factual matrix and the assessee being unable to plead before both the lower authorities, we are inclined to restore the issues raised in the instant appeal in ITA No.723/Kol/2022 to the file of the Assessing Officer and provide one opportunity to the assessee for furnishing relevant documents in order to explain the source of Rs.10,00,000/- received during the year from Sri Suraj Verma. Needless to mention that proper opportunity of being heard should be provided to the assessee. &723/Kol/2022 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 Alosha Vanijya Pvt. Ltd
In the result, the appeal of the assessee in is allowed and ITA No.723/Kol/2022 is allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 15th March, 2023.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026