RAJKUMAR POPATLAL SHINGVI,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-25(4)., KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 178/KOL/2023Status: HeardITAT Kolkata19 April 2023AY 2012-133 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contention that the CIT(A) order was ex-parte and lacked proper adjudication. The matter was restored to the AO for de novo adjudication after providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) resulted in an ex-parte order as the assessee did not receive hearing notices and could not file submissions. The CIT(A) merely reiterated the AO's assessment order without dealing with the merits.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex-parte without providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee is sustainable.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘A’, KOLKATA

Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Hearing: 18.04.2023Pronounced: 19.04.2023

ORDER

Per Sonjoy Sarma, JM:

1.

This appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2012- 13 is directed against the order dated 04.01.2023 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax, Appeals, NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘the ‘ld. CIT(A)’].

2.

At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the order of the ld. CIT(A) is an ex-parte order and nothing has been dealt on merits except reiterating assessment order on the disallowances/additions made by the ld. AO. The assessee could not get any opportunity to file its submissions and other relevant details before the authority below. Since none of the notices for hearing of the appeal was received by the assessee. Thus, the assessee referring to grounds of appeal, it has prayed that grounds raised in the instant appeal may be restored to the ld. AO for adjudicating afresh after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Rajkumar Popatlal Shingvi 3. Per contra, ld. DR was fair enough not to oppose this request of the ld. counsel for the assessee.

4.

We have heard the rival contentions and perused the records placed before us. Through grounds, the assessee has stated that ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate the materials on record and passed the order ex-parte. On perusal of the impugned order, we noticed that the instant ground raised by the assessee has merit as in the impugned order, ld. CIT(A) merely reproduced grounds of appeal raised by the assessee and the decision part, finding has been given only reiterating the assessment order passed by the ld. AO, as the assessee in the instant case could not able to file necessary details as well as submissions at the time of hearing before the ld. CIT(A) and before the ld. AO and both the orders are ex-parte. Under these given facts and circumstances, we restore the matter in the instant appeal to the file of ld. AO for de novo adjudicating in accordance with law after considering the submission made by the assessee for which reasonable opportunity of being heard should be provided. The assessee also directed to remain vigilant and file necessary documents in support of its grounds of appeal and should not take any further adjournment, unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. In case after providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee, there is no compliance before the ld. AO, then the ld. AO can proceed to pass the order in accordance with law.

Rajkumar Popatlal Shingvi 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →