KAYANAT WELFARE ASSOCIATION,PATNA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-1,PATNA, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that both revenue authorities failed to provide sufficient opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case, violating the principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(Appeals) for a fresh hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a welfare association, filed its return of income. Notices issued by the Assessing Officer and CIT(Appeals) were not served or responded to, leading to ex-parte assessments and dismissal of appeal. The assessee contended it was not given an opportunity to present its case.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was provided with adequate opportunity to present its case before the revenue authorities. Whether the principles of natural justice were followed during the assessment and appellate proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA-PATNA ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-(KZ) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi
Per Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-President (KZ):- The present appeal is directed at the instance of assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 11th January, 2024 passed for Assessment Year 2016-17.
The assessee is a Society, registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1980 and engaged in the charitable activities. The appellate-Society filed its return of income for the assessment year 2016-17 declaring total income of Rs.6,050/-. The case was selected for scrutiny. Accordingly, notice dated 19.07.2017 under section 143(2) of the Act was issued to the assessee. The said notice was not served upon the assessee. However, on 12.04.2018, notice under section 142(1) was issued to the assessee, but it was not served on the assessee. Thereafter a show-cause notice was issued to the assessee, but there was no response from the assessee. Thereafter ld. Assessing Officer concluded the assessment under section 144 of the Act by disallowing the expenditure of Rs.38,51,539/- and assessed income at Rs.38,57,585/-.
On being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(Appeals). During the appellate proceedings, ld. CIT(Appeals) also issued several notices but there was no response from the assessee. Thereafter ld. CIT(Appeals) has considered the material available on record and dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee since the assessee has not filed any evidence before him to substantiate its case.
On being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ITAT.
(A.Y. 2016-2017) Kayanat Welfare Association 5. The main grievance of the assessee is that the appellant was not given any opportunity to put forth its contention and place evidences before the ld. CIT(Appeals). Before the Tribunal, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and perusing the material placed on record, we are of the considered view that both the revenue authorities have not given sufficient opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case.
The ld. Departmental Representative submitted that many number of opportunities have given to the assessee but there was no response from the assessee. Therefore, Revenue Authorities have no option except passing of the order based on the material available on record. He, therefore, pleaded to uphold the order passed by the ld. CIT(Appeals).
We have heard the ld. D.R. and perused the material available on record. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in order to meet the principle of natural justice, we are inclined to set aside the order passed by the ld. CIT(Appeals) and remit the matter back to the file of ld. CIT(Appeals) with a direction to provide one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee. At the same breath, we also hereby caution the assessee to promptly co-operate with the proceedings before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) failing which the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law and merits based on the materials available on the record. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 12/12/2024.
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Subhash Chand Saini, Jaipur vs ITO Ward, Behror, BherorITA 36/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Siddharth Barai (Prop- Siddharth Design Studio) vs. The Superintendent CGST And Central Excise, Balangir RangeOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Shashibhusan Moharana vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, DhenkanalOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Paramount Tea Marketing PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S Sanjeevini Health Care vs. M/S.Vijayalakshmi And AssociatesKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026
- Trilok Chandra vs. State Tax OfficerUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026