DEEP JYOTI WAX TRADERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6/KOL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 July 2023AY 2014-20155 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee had the option to determine the FMV of shares as per Rule 11UA(2)(a) or (b). Since the assessee opted for the DCF method under Rule 11UA(2)(b), the AO's determination under Rule 11UA(2)(a) was not justified.

What were the facts?

The assessee company issued shares at a premium. The Assessing Officer (AO) added the difference between the issue price and the fair market value (FMV) determined by the AO, treating it as income under Section 56(2)(viib). The assessee had obtained an FMV report from a chartered accountant using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method.

What were the issues?

Whether the Assessing Officer was justified in re-determining the fair market value of shares when the assessee had opted for a specific method prescribed under the rules, and whether the addition made under Section 56(2)(viib) was sustainable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 56(2)(viib)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

order : July 10, 2023 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग�, �या�यक सद�य �वारा / Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 07.11.2022 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).

2.

The sole issue raised by the assessee is relating to the addition made by the Assessing Officer of Rs.1,16,65,600/- u/s 56(2) of the Act on account of excess share premium received by the assessee as compared to the fair market value of the shares.

3.

The assessee during the year issued 920000 shares @10/- each and further of Rs.40/- each raising total share capital including share Assessment year: 2014-15 Deep Jyoti Wax Traders Pvt. Ltd premium of Rs.46000000/- The Assessing Officer however determined the fair market price of the shares issued by the assessee at Rs.27.3/- per share and he further observed that the assessee had issued shares @ Rs.40/-. He added the differential amount of Rs.11665600/- u/s 56(2)(viib) of the Act. As per the provisions of section 56(2)(viib) of the Act, the fair market value of the shares can be determined in the following manner:

1.

(a) the fair market value of the shares shall be the value – (i) as may be determined in accordance with such method as may be prescribed, or (ii) as may be substantiated by the company to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer, based on the value, on the date of issue of shares, of its assets, including intangible assets being goodwill, know-how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature, Whichever is higher;

4.

The case of the assessee is that the fair market value of the shares was determined by the method prescribed under Rule 11UA of the Income Tax Rules 1962. The relevant part of which is reproduced as under: “[(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-clause (b) of clause (c) of sub-rule (1), the fair market value of unquoted equity shares for the purposes of sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of Explanation to clause (viib) of sub-section (2) of section 56 shall be the value, on the valuation date, of such unquoted equity shares as determined in the following manner under clause (a) or clause (b), at the option of the assessee, namely:— (A–L) × (a) the fair market value of unquoted equity shares = (PV), (PE) where, A = book value of the assets in the balance-sheet as reduced by any amount of tax paid as deduction or collection at source or as advance tax payment as reduced by the amount of tax claimed as refund under the Income-tax Act and any amount shown in the balance-sheet as Assessment year: 2014-15 Deep Jyoti Wax Traders Pvt. Ltd asset including the unamortised amount of deferred expenditure which does not represent the value of any asset; L = book value of liabilities shown in the balance-sheet, but not including the following amounts, namely:— (i) the paid-up capital in respect of equity shares; (ii) the amount set apart for payment of dividends on preference shares and equity shares where such dividends have not been declared before the date of transfer at a general body meeting of the company; (iii) reserves and surplus, by whatever name called, even if the resulting figure is negative, other than those set apart towards depreciation; (iv) any amount representing provision for taxation, other than amount of tax paid as deduction or collection at source or as advance tax payment as reduced by the amount of tax claimed as refund under the Income-tax Act, to the extent of the excess over the tax payable with reference to the book profits in accordance with the law applicable thereto; (v) any amount representing provisions made for meeting liabilities, other than ascertained liabilities; (vi) any amount representing contingent liabilities other than arrears of dividends payable in respect of cumulative preference shares; PE = total amount of paid up equity share capital as shown in the balance-sheet; PV = the paid up value of such equity shares; or (b) the fair market value of the unquoted equity shares determined by a merchant banker or an accountant as per the Discounted Free Cash Flow method.]”

5.

It is pertinent to mention here that as per the relevant rules as applicable for assessment year under consideration i.e. 2014-15, it was at the option of the assessee to get the fair market value of the share determined from a merchant banker or an accountant as per the Discounted Free Cash Flow Method. The ld. counsel for the assessee has produced on record a report of S. K. Vyas & Associates, C.A., who have calculated the fair market value of the shares at Rs.50/- per share as per Discounted Cash Flow Method. A perusal of the order of the Assessing

More judgments on Section 56(2)(viib)

All 746 judgments and leading authorities on Section 56(2)(viib) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →