BENGAL PEERLESS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal corrected the figures for 'Advertisement and Publicity' and 'Brokerage and commission'. The amount for Advertisement and Publicity was corrected from Rs.3,50,900/- to Rs.3,15,50,900/-, and Brokerage and commission from Rs.44,20,600/- to Rs.44,20,680/-.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum to a previous ITAT order for the assessment year 2019-20. A typographical numerical error was identified in the original order regarding expenses.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was a typographical error in the numerical figures of expenses reported in the original ITAT order.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
order passed by the Tribunal dated 01.03.2023 in wherein a typographical numerical error has been occurred in page 8, para 10.1 which is as under: 1. Advertisement and Publicity - Rs.3,50,900/- 2. Brokerage and commission - Rs.44,20,600/- 2. The rectified amount to be read as under: 1. Advertisement and Publicity to be read as Rs. 3,15,50,900/- instead of Rs.3,50,900/- 2. Brokerage and commission to be read as Rs.44,20,680/- instead of Rs.44,20,600/-. Sd/- Sd/- (RAJPAL YADAV) (GIRISH AGRAWAL) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Kolkata, Dated: 10.07.2023 JD, Sr. P.S.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026