KOHINOOR GOODS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD-13(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's ground that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order and that the AO also failed to consider the evidence. Therefore, the case was restored to the AO for de novo adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) without considering the assessee's submissions or evidence. The assessee claimed they were denied an opportunity to present their case due to a rejected adjournment request.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order was ex-parte and if the AO considered the assessee's evidence, leading to a denial of natural justice.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “B”, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]
ORDER
Per Sonjoy Sarma, JM:
This appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order dated 22.12.2022 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax, Appeals, NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘the ‘ld. CIT(A)’].
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the order of the ld. CIT(A) is an ex-parte order and nothing has been dealt on merits except reiterating assessment order on the disallowances/additions made by the ld. AO. The assessee could not get any opportunity to file its submissions and other relevant details before the first appellate authority due to rejection of request of the assessee to grant adjournment. The ld. counsel also stated that even the AO framed the assessment without considering the evidences filed by the assessee. The ld. counsel, therefore, prayed that the ends of justice would be met if the case is restored to the file of AO for re-adjudication afresh.
2 AY: 2014-15 Kohinoor Goods Private Limited 3. Per contra, ld. DR was fair enough not to oppose this request of the ld. counsel for the assessee.
We have heard the rival contentions and perused the records placed before us. Through grounds, the assessee has stated that ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate the materials on record and passed the order ex-parte. On perusal of the impugned order, we noticed that the instant ground raised by the assessee has merit. We also note that even the AO has not taken into accounts the evidences filed by the assessee. Under these given facts and circumstances the ends of justice would be met if we restore the matter in the instant appeals to the file of ld. AO for de novo adjudicating of the matter in accordance with law after considering the submissions made by the assessee for which reasonable opportunity of being heard should be provided. The assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and file necessary documents in support of its grounds of appeal and should not take any further adjournment, unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. In case after providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee, there is no compliance before the ld. AO, then the ld. AO can proceed to pass the order in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026