BUSINESS FUNCTION CONSULTANCY PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 5(3), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1972/KOL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 August 2023AY 2012-133 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that an appeal cannot be adjudicated in the name of a non-existent entity. Therefore, the appeal filed by the amalgamating company was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee company, Business Function Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., had merged with Emerald Properties Pvt. Ltd. prior to the filing of the appeal. The appeal was filed in the name of the non-existent amalgamating company.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed in the name of a merged/non-existent company can be adjudicated. The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal and file a fresh one in the name of the amalgamated company.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH: KOLKATA

Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Heard together (2 matters)

I.T.A. No. 1972/Kol/2018
ITA No. 355/Kol/2023

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-23, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 19.07.2018 for the AY 2012-13.

2.

At the outset the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the appeal in this case has been filed in the name of M/s Business Function Constancy Pvt. Ltd. which was merged with Emerald Properties Pvt. Ltd. vide order dated 23.12.2015 in the Assessment Year: 2012-13 Business Function Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. scheme of amalgamation. The Ld. A.R also pointed out that even the appellate order has been passed in the name of non-existent company as the amalgamation has happened prior to that date as stated hereinabove. The Ld. A.R therefore prayed before the Bench that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal filed in the name of non-existent entity i.e. amalgamating company and further prayed that a leave may be granted to file fresh appeal in the name of amalgamated company and delay in filing the appeal may be condoned from the date of filing of the present appeal till the communication of the order by the tribunal and further the assessee may be allowed reasonable period to file the appeal thereafter. The Ld. A.R therefore prayed before the Bench that the present appeal may kindly be dismissed with a liberty to the assessee to file fresh appeal in the name of M/S Emerald Properties Pvt. Ltd. The ld AR in defense of his prayers relied on the decision of the coordinate bench in the case of Sangit Tracon (P) Ltd. Vs ITO Ward 5(2) ,Kolkata A.Y. 2012-13.

3.

The Ld. D.R on the other hand left the issue to the wisdom of the Bench.

4.

After hearing rival contentions and perusing the material on record, we observe that the assessee has filed the instant appeal in the name of amalgamating company which has merged with M/S Emerald Properties Pvt. Ltd. vide order dated 23.12.2015 passed by the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court. We are of the view that the appeal in the name of amalgamating company cannot be adjudicated as being non-existent entity and it has to be the name of amalgamated company. Accordingly we are dismissing this appeal of the assessee with liberty to file fresh appeal in the name of amalgamated company. Pertinent to state that the time period from the date of filing of this appeal till communication of this order plus 60 days would not be considered while reckoning limitation period for filing fresh appeal in the name amalgamated company.

Assessment Year: 2012-13 Business Function Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed in terms of observations/directions given above.

Order is pronounced in the open court on 22nd August, 2023

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →